The Wall Street Journal reported that 33 
Experts worried about the implications of the case, which could have affected upcoming elections and gerrymandering and eroded trust in election systems.
RELATED: Supreme Court hears arguments that could change election laws
https://tinyurl.com/yp9f84zh
The Supreme Court on Tuesday shot down a conservative theory that could have given state lawmakers extraordinary power to set election rules in their states with little oversight from courts, balking at an idea that voting rights groups worried could further erode trust in the nation’s elections.
“Since early in our nation’s history, courts have recognized their duty to evaluate the constitutionality of legislative acts,” Roberts wrote.
The appeal took on added significance because of the 2020 election, during which several courts ruled on absentee ballot procedures amid the lockdowns in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Republicans felt that, in some of those cases, courts had overstepped their authority. Democrats, on the other hand, had framed those same decisions as protecting voters from disenfranchisement.
» Subscribe to USA TODAY: http://bit.ly/1xa3XAh
» Watch more on this and other topics from USA TODAY: https://bit.ly/3FzxQa0
» USA TODAY delivers current local and national news, sports, entertainment, finance, technology, and more through award-winning journalism, photos, videos and VR.
#SCOTUS #Politics #Laws
The Pulse of Washington D.C.
